Case Law › High Court › The Cit v. M/S.set India Pvt.ltd

The Cit v. M/S.set India Pvt.ltd

High Court 26 Feb 2008 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

26 Feb 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Cit v. M/S.set India Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: As the Motion for condoning delay is dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4173 OF 2007 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1920 OF 2007 The CIT ..Appellant Versus M/s.Set India Pvt.Ltd., ..Respondent ---- Mr.A.D.Kango & Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant. Mr.Dinesh Vyas & P.C.Tripathi for the respondent. ---- Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Date : 26.02.2008 PC 1. This is a Motion for condoning 477 days delay in filing of the main appeal. A perusal of the affidavit-in-support indicates that though the judicial CIT granted approval for filing the appeal on 7.4.2006 the file was sent to the Advocate for drafting appeal memo on 14.12.2006. The appeal was thereafter filed only on 22.8.2007. The delay between the period 7.4.2006 and 14.12.2006 as well as between 14.12.2006 and 22.8.2007 has not been properly explained. Therefore, the cause shown does not amount to sufficient cause. Hence, Motion stands dismissed. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1920 OF 2007 . As the Motion for condoning delay is dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed. (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.