Case LawHigh Court › The Cit v. M/S.wockhardt Ltd

The Cit v. M/S.wockhardt Ltd

High Court 28 Aug 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit v. M/S.wockhardt Ltd
Date of order
28 Aug 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Cit v. M/S.wockhardt Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.533 OF 2003 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.533 OF 2003 The CIT .. Appellant Vs. M/s.Wockhardt Ltd. .. Respondent Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant. Dr.K.Shivram with Mr.A.K.Jasani for Respondent. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ. DATE : 28th August, 2008 DATE : 28th August, 2008 P.C. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. This Appeal has already been admitted on 19.10.2004 on the only one substantial question of law mentioned in the said order. Dr.Shivram, the learned Counsel for the Respondent has brought to our notice that the similar question of law, as is raised in this Appeal, has already been decided by this Court in favour of the Assessee and against the Revenue, in the Assessee’s own case viz.ITXA (L) No.70 of 2003 - CIT V/s.Wockhardt ITXA (L) No.70 of 2003 - CIT V/s.WockhardtLimited, by an order dated 5.12.2005. Hence, for the Limited same reasons as recorded in the aforesaid order dated 5.12.2005, the question of law raised in this Appeal is also answered in favour of the Assessee and against the Revenue. Appeal stands dismissed. (S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan