The Cit v. Shankarlal Kejriwal

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2002 OF 2008 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2002 OF 2008 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2002 OF 2008 IN IN IN APPEAL (L) NO.1747 OF 2007 INCOME TAXAPPEAL (L) NO.1747 OF 2007 INCOME TAX INCOME TAX The CIT .. Appellant Vs. Shankarlal Kejriwal .. Respondent Mr.D.K.Kamwal for the Appellant. Mr.P.R.Toprani for the Respondent. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ. DATE : 25th September, 2008 DATE : 25th September, 2008 P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By this Notice of Motion, the Appellant is seeking condonation of 207 days’ delay caused in filing the Appeal. For the reasons stated in the affidavit-in-support of the Notice of Motion, sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay, and there is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Appellant. Hence, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)