The Cit v. Shri Anurag Modi
High Court
14 Jan 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit v. Shri Anurag Modi
Date of order
14 Jan 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Cit v. Shri Anurag Modi, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4339 OF 2007
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG.) NO.2212 OF 2007
The CIT ..Appellant
Versus
Shri Anurag Modi ..Respondent
----
Mr.B.M.Chatterji with Mrs.P.P.Bhosale &
P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant.
Mr.Y.P.Trivedi Sr.Counsel with Ms.Usha Dalal for
respondent.
----
Coram : F.I.REBELLO &
R.S.MOHITE,JJ
Date : 14.01.2008.
PC
1. Heard Advocates for the parties.
2. This is a Motion for condonation of 208 days
delay in filing of the main appeal. On perusal of
the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion, in
our view, sufficient cause has been shown. No
affidavit in reply has been filed. Hence, we accept
the cause shown as sufficient cause and condone the
delay subject to payment of Rs.2500/- as cost to the
respondent. Cost to be paid to the respondent
within a period of four weeks from today. Notice of
Motion allowed accordingly.
: 2 :
(R.S.MOHITE,J) (F.I.REBELLO,J)
(R.S.MOHITE,J) (F.I.REBELLO,J)
(R.S.MOHITE,J) (F.I.REBELLO,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue