The Cit v. This Is A Motion For Condoning 721 Days Delay In
High Court
25 Feb 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit v. This Is A Motion For Condoning 721 Days Delay In
Date of order
25 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Cit v. This Is A Motion For Condoning 721 Days Delay In, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: As the Motion for condoning delay is dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2368 OF 2007
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1135 OF 2007
The CIT ..Appellant
Versus
M/s.Cupid Travels & Tours Pvt.Ltd.,.Respondent
----
Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellant.
----
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Date : 25.02.2008
PC
1. This is a Motion for condoning 721 days delay in
filing of the main appeal. A perusal of the
affidavit-in-support indicates that the scrutiny
report was received in the office of jurisdictional
CIT on 21.4.2005 and thereafter the file was sent to
Counsel for drafting after a period of one year and
8 months on 20.12.2006. In our view, the delay
caused between the aforesaid period has not been
explained. Therefore, the cause shown does not
amount to sufficient cause. Hence, Motion stands
dismissed.
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1135 OF 2007
. As the Motion for condoning delay is dismissed,
appeal also stands dismissed.
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue