Case LawHigh Court › The Cit v. Union Bank Of India

The Cit v. Union Bank Of India

High Court 27 Feb 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit v. Union Bank Of India
Date of order
27 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Cit v. Union Bank Of India, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: As the Motion for condoning delay is dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1861 OF 2007 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1014 OF 2007 The CIT ..Appellant Versus Union Bank of India ..Respondent ---- Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant. Ms.Usha Srivastava i/by C.Juris for the respondent. ---- Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Date : 27.02.2008 PC 1. This is a Motion for condoning 1078 days delay in filing of the main appeal. On perusal of the affidavit-in-support, we find that the scrutiny report was received in the office of the jurisdictional CIT on 6.4.2004 but the file was sent for drafting an appeal on 6.2.2007. In our view, the delay caused between the aforesaid period has not been properly explained. Therefore, the cause shown does not amount to sufficient cause. Hence, Motion stands dismissed. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1014 OF 2007 . As the Motion for condoning delay is dismissed, appeal also stands dismissed. (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan