The Cit v. Wall Street Construction Ltd
High Court
22 Aug 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit v. Wall Street Construction Ltd
Date of order
22 Aug 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Cit v. Wall Street Construction Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In view of dismissal of the Notice of Motion, the Appeal also stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1770 OF 2003
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1770 OF 2003
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1770 OF 2003
IN
IN
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.570 OF 2003
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.570 OF 2003
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.570 OF 2003
The CIT .. Appellant
Vs.
Wall Street Construction Ltd. .. Respondent
None for the Appellant.
Mr.P.R.Toprani for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ.
DATE : 22nd August, 2008
DATE : 22nd August, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
1. This Notice of Motion has been registered on
23.6.2003. Today nobody is appearing on behalf of the
Appellant. The learned Counsel for the Respondent is
present. Hence, the Notice of Motion stands dismissed
in default.
2. In view of dismissal of the Notice of Motion, the
Appeal also stands dismissed.
(S.J.KATHAWALLA,J.)
(S.J.KATHAWALLA,J.)(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(S.J.KATHAWALLA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue