The Cit - Xxiii v. Nathpa Jhakri Joint Venture
High Court
02 Dec 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Cit - Xxiii v. Nathpa Jhakri Joint Venture
Date of order
02 Dec 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Cit - Xxiii v. Nathpa Jhakri Joint Venture, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.166 OF 2006
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.166 OF 2006
The CIT - XXIII .. Appellant
Vs.
Nathpa Jhakri Joint Venture .. Respondent
Mr.Abhay Ahuja with Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant.
Mr.Sanjiv M.Shah for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
V.C.DAGA, JJ.
DATE : 2nd December, 2008
P.C.
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. Perused
the Tribunal’s order dated 25.11.2005. The Tribunal in
it’s order in paragraph No.8 has clearly observed as
under:-
"......However, since facts of the case remains the
same, i.e. the business of the assessee has
commenced, we are inclined to respectfully follow
decision of the Tribunal in assessee’s own case
referred above and allow ground nos.1 & 2 by holding
that interest income is rightly adjusted against
WIP."
2. The learned Counsel for the Appellant concedes that
for the two assessment orders i.e for the years 1996-97
& 1997-98 the Appeals filed by the Department have
already been rejected by this Court in view of the fact
that the Appellant had not bothered to remove the office
objections, and even till date the Appellant has not
taken any steps to get those Appeals restored to file.
3. We are not inclined to entertain this Appeal.
Appeal stands dismissed.
(V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.