In The C.i.t.central-Iii, Mumbai v. M/S.mirc Electronics Ltd.mumbai, the High Court (2005) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: Hence the Appeal stands dismissed. ....
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.400 OF 2004
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.400 OF 2004
The C.I.T.Central-III, Mumbai .. Appellant
V/s
M/s.MIRC Electronics Ltd.Mumbai .. Respondents
Mr.Pankaj Kapoor for the Appellant.
CORAM: S.RADHAKRISHNAN &J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
CORAM: S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 25.01.2005.
DATE : 25.01.2005.
DATE : 25.01.2005.
P.C.:
P.C.:
P.C.:
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellant. The
learned Counsel for the Appellant states that the issue
involved in this Appeal is squarely covered by the decision in the case of Broke Bond India Limited V/sC.I.T.- 225 ITR 798. Hence the Appeal stands dismissed.
....
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue