The Coimbatore District Central Co-Operative Bank Limited,Dr.nanjappa Road Branch,Rep. By Its Manager,Mr.s.s.krishnamoorthy215, Dr.nanjappa Roadcoimbatore 641 0 v. The Income Tax Officer,Tds Ward 1(5)
High Court
07 May 2014 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
The Coimbatore District Central Co-Operative Bank Limited,Dr.nanjappa Road Branch,Rep. By Its Manager,Mr.s.s.krishnamoorthy215, Dr.nanjappa Roadcoimbatore 641 0 v. The Income Tax Officer,Tds Ward 1(5)
Date of order
07 May 2014
Assessment year(s)
2008-2009
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Coimbatore District Central Co-Operative Bank Limited,Dr.nanjappa Road Branch,Rep. By Its Manager,Mr.s.s.krishnamoorthy215, Dr.nanjappa Roadcoimbatore 641 0 v. The Income Tax Officer,Tds Ward 1(5), the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal under Section 201, Section 194A, Section 246A of the Income-tax Act. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 08.05.2014
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR
Writ Petition Nos.13232 to 13238 of 2014and M.P.Nos.1 (7 M.Ps.) of 2014
W.P.No.13232 of 2014:
The Coimbatore District Central Co-operative Bank Limited,Dr.Nanjappa Road Branch,Rep. By its Manager,Mr.S.S.Krishnamoorthy215, Dr.Nanjappa RoadCoimbatore 641 018.
vs.
... Petitioner
The Income Tax Officer,TDS Ward 1(5),No.63, Race Course Road,3[rd] Floor, Annexe Building,Coimbatore – 641 018
... Respondent
Prayer :Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the respondent u/s 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 vide File No.CMBT04766G/F.Y.2007-08, dated 30.03.2014 for the Assessment Year 2008-2009 and to quash the same.
For Petitioner :Mr.K.RaviFor Respondent:Mr.Pramod Kumar Chopra Standing Counsel for Income Tax Dept.,
C O M M O N O R D E R
These Writ Petitions have been filed by the Coimbatore District Central Co-operative Bank Limited, Dr.Nanjappa Road Branch to call for the records pertaining to the impugned orders passed by the respondent u/s 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 relating to the assessment years 2008-09 to 2014-15 and to quash the same.
2. Heard both sides.
3. The assessee deductor is in the business of banking. When a survey was conducted in the business premises of the bank on 14.11.2013 by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, TDS Circle, Coimbatore it was found that the assessee was not deducting tax at source on the interest paid to the depositors. Hence a notice under Section 131(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was issued on 24.03.2014 calling upon the petitioner to furnish branch wise details of deposits attracting TDS provisions. Since the assessee could not produce the details as called for by the Department, based on the data available with the Department, the assessment orders have been
passed for various assessment years and consequently the assessment was made in terms of Section 201(1) and 201(A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the Co-operative Banks are exempted from making tax deduction at source in terms of Section 194A (3)(v) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. He further submitted that the Authority declined to accept the plea of the assessee and passed the assessment orders demanding tax and interest relating to the assessment years 2008-09 to 2014-15 and that order is now under challenge in these batch of writ petitions.
5. Learned Standing counsel appearing for the Income Tax Department submitted that the petitioner has got an appeal remedy under Section 246A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and without exhausting the said provision, the petitioner has come before this Court by way of these writ petitions.
6. Considering the facts and law, the plea of the petitioner that the impugned assessment orders and the demand notice have to be set aside cannot be countenanced as the Act specifically provides an
appeal remedy and the same has to be exhausted first by the petitioner before approaching this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Hence, the writ petitions at this stage are not maintainable and the same are dismissed. However, liberty is given to the petitioner to file an appeal before the appropriate authority as against the impugned orders within a period of thirty days' from today. On such appeal being filed, the authority shall decide the same on merits and in accordance with law without rejecting it, only on the ground of limitation.
7. With the above direction, these writ petitions are dismissed.
Consequently connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. No costs.
Index: NoInternet: Yes
08.05.2014
vj2Note: Issue order copy on 13.05.2014
appeal remedy and the same has to be exhausted first by the petitioner before approaching this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Hence, the writ petitions at this stage are not maintainable and the same are dismissed. However, liberty is given to the petitioner to file an appeal before the appropriate authority as against the impugned orders within a period of thirty days' from today. On such appeal being filed, the authority shall decide the same on merits and in accordance with law without rejecting it, only on the ground of limitation.
7. With the above direction, these writ petitions are dismissed.
Consequently connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. No costs.
Index: NoInternet: Yes
08.05.2014
vj2Note: Issue order copy on 13.05.2014
ToThe Income Tax Officer,TDS Ward 1(5),No.63, Race Course Road,3[rd] Floor, Annexe Building,Coimbatore – 641 018
5
R.SUDHAKAR,J.,
vj2
W.P.Nos.13232 to 13238
of 2014
Dated: 08.05.2014
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.