Case LawHigh Court › The Commisioner Of Income Tax-Iversusshr...

The Commisioner Of Income Tax-Iversusshrigonda Karkhana Ltd v. Ghuge, Jj.dated: October 22, 2013

High Court 22 Oct 2013 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcaurdb
Parties
The Commisioner Of Income Tax-Iversusshrigonda Karkhana Ltd v. Ghuge, Jj.dated: October 22, 2013
Date of order
22 Oct 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In The Commisioner Of Income Tax-Iversusshrigonda Karkhana Ltd v. Ghuge, Jj.dated: October 22, 2013, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.

Decision: 4.Tax Appeal is accordingly disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAYBENCH AT AURANGABAD TAX APPEAL NO. 57 OF 2010 THE COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX-IVERSUSSHRIGONDA KARKHANA LTD ... ASGI for Appellant : Shri Alok M.Sharma Advocate for Respondent 1 : Shri V.D.Hon ... CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, JJ.Dated: October 22, 2013 ... PER COURT :- 1.Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. 2.It is not in dispute that the controversy is covered by the adjudication in Tax Appeal No.76 of 2009 decided on 14.3.2013. 3.Hence, following the same reasons and as same substantial question of law falls for determination, we pass the similar order. Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for deciding it afresh in the light of the decision of the Honourable Supreme Court in the case of Deputy commissioner ofIncome Tax Vs. Shri Satpuda Tapi Parisar Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd.and others [(2010 23a CTS (SC) 224]. 4.Tax Appeal is accordingly disposed of. ( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. ) ( B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J. )...
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan