The Commisioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai v. M/S.tipco Industries Ltd
High Court
21 Apr 2008 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commisioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai v. M/S.tipco Industries Ltd
Date of order
21 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In The Commisioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai v. M/S.tipco Industries Ltd, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.691 OF 2008WITHNOTICE OF MOTION NO.1114 OF 2008
The Commisioner of Income Tax, Mumbai ..Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Tipco Industries Ltd.
..Respondent
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for Appellant.Mr.A.K.Jasani for the Respondent.
P.C.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &SANTOSH BORA, JJ.DATE : 21ST APRIL, 2008
Permissible Court fees be refunded to the Appellant,
as per rules.
.
In view of withdrawal of the above Appeal,
nothing further survives in the Notice of Motion.
Hence, the same stands dismissed.
(SANTOSH BORA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(SANTOSH BORA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue