The Commisioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai v. M/S.tube Craft
High Court
21 Apr 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commisioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai v. M/S.tube Craft
Date of order
21 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commisioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai v. M/S.tube Craft, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1094 OF 2008ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.760 OF 2008WITHNOTICE OF MOTION NO.1095 OF 2008ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.759 OF 2008
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1096 OF 2008ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.758 OF 2008
WITHNOTICE OF MOTION NO.1097 OF 2008ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.757 OF 2008
The Commisioner of Income Tax, Mumbai ..Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Tube Craft
..Respondent
Mr.R.G.Bhat for the Appellant.Mr.J.D.Mistry i/b.A.K.Jasani for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &SANTOSH BORA, JJ.
DATE : 21ST APRIL, 2008
P.C.1.Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. Bythese Notices of Motion, the Appellant is seekingcondonation of 75 days’ delay caused in filing all theabove Appeals. Perused the Notices of Motion andAffidavits-in-support thereof. For the reasons statedtherein sufficient cause is made out for condoning thedelay. There is no case of inaction, negligence orwant of bonafide on the part of the Appellant. Hence,
the Notices of Motion are made absolute in terms of
prayer clause (a).
admission in the month of September,2008, subject to
numbering.
(SANTOSH BORA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(SANTOSH BORA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(SANTOSH BORA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue