The Commisioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai v. Noneappearedforthetherespondentrespondentrespondentthough<Br>Served.though<Br>Served
High Court
21 Apr 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commisioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai v. Noneappearedforthetherespondentrespondentrespondentthough<Br>Served.though<Br>Served
Date of order
21 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commisioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai v. Noneappearedforthetherespondentrespondentrespondentthough<Br>Served.though<Br>Served, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.712 OF 2008ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.479 OF 2008WITHNOTICE OF MOTION NO.713 OF 2008ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.478 OF 2008
The Commisioner of Income Tax, Mumbai ..AppellantVs.Smt.Hotoxi Kanga
..Respondent
Mr.R.G.Bhat for Appellant.None for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &SANTOSH BORA, JJ.
DATE : 21ST APRIL, 2008
P.C.
1.Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellant.
the Notices of Motion are made absolute in terms of
prayer clause (a).
2.
Place the Appeals on board for admission in
the month of September,2008, subject to numbering.
(SANTOSH BORA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(SANTOSH BORA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue