The Commisioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai v. Shri.anil Liladhar Shah
High Court
21 Apr 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commisioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai v. Shri.anil Liladhar Shah
Date of order
21 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commisioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai v. Shri.anil Liladhar Shah, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.642 OF 2008ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.439 OF 2008
WITHNOTICE OF MOTION NO.643 OF 2008ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.438 OF 2008
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.645 OF 2008ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.441 OF 2008
WITHIN
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.646 OF 2008ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.434 OF 2008
WITHNOTICE OF MOTION NO.682 OF 2008ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.440 OF 2008
The Commisioner of Income Tax, Mumbai ..AppellantVs.Shri.Anil Liladhar Shah
..Respondent
Mr.R.G.Bhat for Appellant.Mr.Jitendra Singh for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &SANTOSH BORA, JJ.DATE : 21ST APRIL, 2008
P.C.1.Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. Bythese Notices of Motion, the Appellant is seekingcondonation of 56 days’ delay caused in filing all theabove Appeals. Perused the Notices of Motion andAffidavits-in-support thereof. For the reasons statedtherein sufficient cause is made out for condoning thedelay. There is no case of inaction, negligence orwant of bonafide on the part of the Appellant. Hence,
the Notices of Motion are made absolute in terms of
prayer clause (a).
the month of September,2008, subject to numbering.
(SANTOSH BORA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue