Case LawHigh Court › The Commisioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai v....

The Commisioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai v. Vijay Chauhan (Huf

High Court 21 Apr 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commisioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai v. Vijay Chauhan (Huf
Date of order
21 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commisioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai v. Vijay Chauhan (Huf, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.2614 OF 2007ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1518 OF 2007 The Commisioner of Income Tax, Mumbai ..Appellant Vs. Vijay Chauhan (HUF)..Respondent Mr.R.G.Bhat for Appellant.Ms.Asifa Khan for the Respondent. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &SANTOSH BORA, JJ. DATE : 21ST APRIL, 2008 P.C.1.Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. Bythis Notice of Motion, the Appellant is seekingcondonation of 223 days’ delay caused in filing theAppeal. Perused the Notice of Motion andAffidavit-in-support thereof and theAffidavit-in-reply. For the reasons stated in theAffidavit-in-support of the Notice of Motion,sufficient cause is made out for condoning the delay.There is no case of inaction, negligence or want ofbonafide on the part of the Appellant. Hence, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayerclause (a). 2.Place the Appeal on board for admission in the month of September,2008, subject to numbering. (SANTOSH BORA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan