The Commisioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.adlabs
High Court
10 Apr 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commisioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.adlabs
Date of order
10 Apr 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commisioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.adlabs, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3264 OF 2003ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.571 OF 2002
The Commisioner of Income Tax
Vs.
M/s.Adlabs
..Applicant
..Respondent
Mrs.P.P.Bhosale for the Applicant.Mr.Sameer Dalal for the Respondent.
P.C.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &V.C.DAGA, JJ.
DATE : 10TH APRIL, 2007
1.Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. Bythis Notice of Motion the Applicant is seeking to setaside the orders dated 19/09/2000 and 29/07/2002passed by the Prothonotary and Senior Master, HighCourt, Mumbai and to restore the Appeal to file.Perused the Notice of Motion and the affidavit- in-support thereof. For the reasons stated thereinsufficient cause is made out for restoring the Appealto file. There is no case of inaction, negligence orwant of bonafide on the part of the Applicant. Hence,
the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of
prayer clause (a).
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue