Case Law › High Court › The Commisioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.bal...

The Commisioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.balkrishna Industries Ltd

High Court 17 Dec 2007 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

17 Dec 2007

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commisioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.balkrishna Industries Ltd, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.322 OF 2001 The Commisioner of Income Tax....Appellant Versus M/s.Balkrishna Industries Ltd. ..Respondent Mr. A.D. Kango, for the AppellantMr. F.V. Irani with Mr.A.K. Jasani for respondent CORAM : F.I. REBELLO&R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED : 17TH DECEMBER 2007 P.C. .Appeal was preferred on the sole ground that thejudgment of this Court in Indo Nippon Chemicals Co. Ltd.vs. Commissioner of Income-tax was to be contested before the Supreme Court. confirmed. In the light of that the question as raised would not arise. Appeal disposed of accordingly. (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J) REBELLO, J)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.