The Commisioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.mukund Global Finance Ltd
High Court
21 Apr 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commisioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.mukund Global Finance Ltd
Date of order
21 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commisioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.mukund Global Finance Ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1349 OF 2006IN
INTEREST TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1 OF 2006
WITHIN
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1350 OF 2006ININTEREST TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2 OF 2006
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1351 OF 2006
IN
INTEREST TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3 OF 2006
The Commisioner of Income TaxVs.
..Appellant
M/s.Mukund Global Finance Ltd.
..Respondent
Vimal Gupta with Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for Appellant.None for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &SANTOSH BORA, JJ.DATE : 21ST APRIL, 2008
P.C.1.Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellant.None appeared for the Respondent, though served.Affidavit of service is filed on record. By thisNotice of Motion, the Appellant is seeking condonationof 125 days’ delay caused in filing the above Appeals.Perused the Notice of Motion and Affidavit-in-supportthereof. For the reasons stated therein sufficientcause is made out for condoning the delay. There isno case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide onthe part of the Appellant. Hence, the Notices of
Motion are made absolute in terms of prayer clause(a).
2.Place the above Appeals on board for admission
in the month of August,2008, subject to numbering.
(SANTOSH BORA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(SANTOSH BORA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.