The Commissioenr Of Income Tax-11 v. M/S.sorab S. Engineer & Co
High Court
11 Mar 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioenr Of Income Tax-11 v. M/S.sorab S. Engineer & Co
Date of order
11 Mar 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioenr Of Income Tax-11 v. M/S.sorab S. Engineer & Co, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: For the same reasons set out therein the present Appeal also stands dismissed as the question of law as framed would not arise.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
(-1-)
MGN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.298 OF 2008
The Commissioenr of Income Tax-11..Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Sorab S. Engineer & Co., ..Respondent
Mr. P.S. Sahadevan, for the Appellant.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S.MOHITE,JJ.DATED: 11TH MARCH,2008
CORAM: F.I.
R.S.MOHITE,JJ.
DATED: 11TH MARCH,2008
P.C.:
P.C.:
P.C.:
. The Revenue in respect of the assessee on
the same question had preferred Income Tax Appeal
Lodging No.2649 of 2007. By an order passed today
we have dismissed the said Appeal. For the same
reasons set out therein the present Appeal also
stands dismissed as the question of law as framed
would not arise.
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue