Case LawHigh Court › The Commission Of I.t v. M/S. Indexco In...

The Commission Of I.t v. M/S. Indexco International

High Court 17 Apr 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commission Of I.t v. M/S. Indexco International
Date of order
17 Apr 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commission Of I.t v. M/S. Indexco International, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.

Decision: In view of the dismissal of the appeal, the notice of motion does not survive, hence the same stands disposed of accordingly.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No.367/2003.WITHNOTICE OF MOTION No.1313/2003. The Commission of I.T. ..Appellant. Vs. M/s. Indexco International. ..Respondent.Mr Ashok Kotangale with P.S. Sahadevan for theAppellant. Ms V. B. Patel for the Respondent. CORAM:DR.S. RADHAKRISHNANAND V.C. DAGA,JJ.DATED:17TH APRIL, 2007. P.C.:- 1.Heard the learned counsel for theparties. In the present matter, the followingsubstantial question of law is sought to beraised: Whether on the facts and in thecircumstances of the case, the ITAT wasright in law in holding that order of CITinvoking it’s power under Section 263 ofthe Act was void, ignoring the fact thatthe issues involved and reasons for whichthe proceedings u/s 263 of the Act wereinitiated are totally different from thesubject matter and issues raised inappeal before the CIT (A)?" 2.We have perused the order of ITAT dated28th June, 2002 as well as June, 2002 as well as the order of CIT the Income-tax Act for the assessment years 1993-94 and 1994-95. 3.The Tribunal by it’s order has that the said order is challenged before this Court. involved in the appeal. We, therefore, dismiss the appeal with no order as to costs. 5. In view of the dismissal of the appeal, the notice of motion does not survive, hence the same stands disposed of accordingly. (V.C. DAGA,J.) (DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan