Case Law › High Court › The Commissionelr Of Income Tax-Iv,Pune...

The Commissionelr Of Income Tax-Iv,Pune v. Vithal Sahkri Sakhar Karkhan Ltd

High Court 16 Sep 2008 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

16 Sep 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissionelr Of Income Tax-Iv,Pune v. Vithal Sahkri Sakhar Karkhan Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Following that judgement,the appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.440 OF 2007 The Commissionelr of Income Tax-IV,Pune. Appellant versus Vithal Sahkri Sakhar Karkhan Ltd. Respondent Mr.Vimal Gupta, APP.None for respondent. PC : CORAM : BILAL NAZKI ANDA.A.KUMBHAKONI, JJ. DATE : 16th September 2008 1. The questions framed in the Memo of Appealare covered by the judgement of this Courtreported in 301-ITR-191 (Bom) and are answeredagainst the revenue. Following that judgement,the appeal is dismissed. (BILAL NAZKI, J.) (A.A.KUMBHAKONI, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.