Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner, Income Tax Department,...

The Commissioner, Income Tax Department, Income Tax Office v. The Manager, United India Insurance Company Ltd., Divisional Office

High Court 03 Jul 2020 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · mdubench

Parties

Date of order

03 Jul 2020

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner, Income Tax Department, Income Tax Office v. The Manager, United India Insurance Company Ltd., Divisional Office, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In view of theletter given by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner,this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 03.07.2020 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN W.P.(MD) No.9586 of 2019 (Through Video Conferencing) D.Indira Selvi ... Petitioner 1.The Commissioner, Income Tax Department, Income Tax Office, No.44, Williams Road, Condonement, Trichy District. Vs. 2.The Manager, United India Insurance Company Ltd., Divisional Office, 9/1/2 Ramakrishnapuram (North), Kaur, Karur District. 3.The Branch Manager, AXIS Bank, Karur, Karur District....Respondents PRAYER:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitutionof India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1[st] and2[nd] respondents to refund the TDS amount which was deducted on10.02.2016 from the petitioner's M.C.O.P.No.248 of 2007 awardamount by the 2[nd] respondent and paid to the 1[st] respondent accounton the basis of the 2[nd] respondent's letter in Ref.091300/ACS/2019dated 11.03.2019 to the petitioner within a time stipulated bythis Court. For Petitioner: Ms.J.BalameenakshiFor Respondents: Mr.Dilip Kumar, for R1 Mr.A.Shajahan, for R2 Mr.E.K.Kumaresan, for R3. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ O R D E R The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seekspermission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and he hasgiven a letter to the Registry to that effect. In view of theletter given by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner,this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (cs-ii) / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) Arul KM (09.07.2020) 2P 1C W.P.(MD) No.9586 of 2019 03.07.2020 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.