In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, Kolhapur v. Doodhganga Vedganga Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Office objections to be removed within six weeksfrom today failing which appeal to stand dismissed fornon prosecution without further order of this court.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODG. NO.1230 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Kolhapur.
...Appellant.
Vs.
Doodhganga Vedganga Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd.
...Respondent.
Mr. P.S.Sahadevan with Mr. Vimal Gupta for theAppellant.
Mr. S.M. Inamdar with Mr. A.K. Jasani for theRespondent.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &
R.S.MOHITE, JJ.
DATE : 23rd March, 2009
PC :
1. Admit on the following questions.
time of making payment it was not possible for
assessee to know the tax liability of the payee?
2. To be heard along with Income Tax Appeal No.443 of
2006.
3. Office objections to be removed within six weeksfrom today failing which appeal to stand dismissed fornon prosecution without further order of this court.
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
(F.I. REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue