Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 1, Kolh...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 1, Kolhapur v. Vasantdada Shetkari Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd

High Court 08 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 1, Kolhapur v. Vasantdada Shetkari Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd
Date of order
08 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 1, Kolhapur v. Vasantdada Shetkari Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeals are, therefore, dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3344 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax – 1, PuneVersusBhima Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Limited, Pune ..Appellant. ..Respondents. Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellant.None for the respondent. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.3381 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax – 1, Kolhapur Versus Vasantdada Shetkari Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., ..Appellant. ..Respondents. Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellant.None for the respondent. CORAM : V.C. DAGA &J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 8TH JULY, 2009 P.C. : 1.The issue sought to be raised in these appeals is covered by the judgment of this Court delivered on 30-06-2009 in the case of TheCommissioner of Income Tax V/s. Kisanveer Satara Sakhar KarkhanaLimitedin Income Tax Appeal No.930 of 2008. 2.In this view of the matter, we see no substantial question of law in these appeals. The appeals are, therefore, dismissed with no order as to costs. (J.P. Devadhar, J.) (V.C. Daga, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan