Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 1, Mumb...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 1, Mumbai v. Deloite Touhe Tohmatsu India Private Limited

High Court 06 Dec 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 1, Mumbai v. Deloite Touhe Tohmatsu India Private Limited
Date of order
06 Dec 2010
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 1, Mumbai v. Deloite Touhe Tohmatsu India Private Limited, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 3.For the reasons stated therein, this appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.395 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax – 1, Mumbai..Appellant. Versus Deloite Touhe Tohmatsu India Private Limited..Respondent. Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellant.Mr.Atul K. Jasani for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & R.M. Savant, JJ. P.C. : DATE : 6[th] December, 2010. Objections waived. 2.Counsel for the parties state that the question raised in this appeal is covered against the Revenue by the decision of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. WMI Cranes Limited (Income Tax Appeal No.1155 of 2007 dated 9[th] October 2007). 3.For the reasons stated therein, this appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. (R.M. Savant, J.) (J.P. Devadhar, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan