The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 1, Mumbai v. Kalyani Brakes Limited, Pune
High Court
02 Jul 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 1, Mumbai v. Kalyani Brakes Limited, Pune
Date of order
02 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 1, Mumbai v. Kalyani Brakes Limited, Pune, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Decision: 2.The appeal is thus disposed of with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2582 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 1, Mumbai
..Appellant.
Versus
Kalyani Brakes Limited, Pune
..Respondent.
Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellant.Mr.A.K. Jasani for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 2[nd] July, 2009
P.C. :
1.Heard learned counsel for the revenue. Both parties agree that in view of the judgment of Supreme Court in the case of Rotork Controls-India (P.) Limited V/s. Commissioner of Incometax, Chennal reported in[2009] 180 Taxman 422 (SC), the matter needs to be remanded back to the tribunal for consideration and decision afresh.
2.The appeal is thus disposed of with no order as to costs.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
(V.C. Daga, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue