Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 1, Mumb...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 1, Mumbai v. M/S.b.e. Billimoria Construction Co., Mumbai

High Court 28 Mar 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 1, Mumbai v. M/S.b.e. Billimoria Construction Co., Mumbai
Date of order
28 Mar 2011
Assessment year(s)
1995-96
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 1, Mumbai v. M/S.b.e. Billimoria Construction Co., Mumbai, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: 1.The question of law raised in this appeal is, whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in setting aside the proceedings initiated for reopening of the assessment for the assessment year 1995-96.

Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.6100 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax - 1, Mumbai..Appellant. VersusM/s.B.E. Billimoria Construction Co., Mumbai..Respondent. Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellant.Mr.F.V. Irani with Mr.P.C. Tripathi for the respondent. P.C. : CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & Smt.R.S. Dalvi, JJ. DATE : 28[th] March, 2011. 1.The question of law raised in this appeal is, whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in setting aside the proceedings initiated for reopening of the assessment for the assessment year 1995-96. 2.Admittedly, the assessment for assessment year 1995-96 is sought to reopened beyond a period of four years from the end of relevant assessment year. Perusal of para-9 of the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal shows that the Tribunal on consideration of the facts on record arrived at a finding of fact that all the relevant material were before the assessing officer at the time of original assessment and that there was no failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for the purpose of assessment. The Tribunal has further recorded a finding of fact that it was only a case of mere change of opinion. 3.In this view of the matter, we see no reason to interfere with the order of the Tribunal. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. No costs. (Smt.R.S. Dalvi, J.) (J.P. Devadhar, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan