The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 1, Mumbai v. M/S.bennet Coleman & Co. Limited
High Court
26 Jun 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 1, Mumbai v. M/S.bennet Coleman & Co. Limited
Date of order
26 Jun 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 1, Mumbai v. M/S.bennet Coleman & Co. Limited, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Failure on the part of the appellant to remove office objections, both the appeals shall stand dismissed without any reference to the Court.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.1944 OF 2009ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1994 OF 2008
AND
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1941 OF 2009
ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1995 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 1, MumbaiVersusM/s.Bennet Coleman & Co. Limited
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the appellant.Mr.Jas Sanghvi i/by PDS Legal for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA &J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 26th JUNE, 2009
P.C. :
1.Heard learned counsel for the appellant and the respondent. Perused the affidavit in support of both the Notices of Motion. For the reasons stated in the affidavits, both the Notices of Motion are made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Notice of Motion is disposed of accordingly with no order are to costs.
2.Appellant is directed to remove office objections and get the appeals numbered. Failure on the part of the appellant to remove office objections, both the appeals shall stand dismissed without any reference to the Court.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
(V.C. Daga, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue