The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 1, Mumbai v. M/S.panchal Components & Appliances Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai
High Court
18 Sep 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 1, Mumbai v. M/S.panchal Components & Appliances Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai
Date of order
18 Sep 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 1, Mumbai v. M/S.panchal Components & Appliances Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 3.The appeal is thus dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.380 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 1, Mumbai..Appellant.
Versus
M/s.Panchal Components & Appliances Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai..Respondent.
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.Ms.Aasifa Khan for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 18TH SEPTEMBER 2009
P.C. :
1.Heard learned counsel for the revenue. He brought to our notice that by the impugned order, the Tribunal has decided five appeals, out of which appeal has been filed only in one case, whereas in all other cases, the impugned order has been accepted by the revenue.
2.Under these circumstances, we do not see any substantial question of law arising in this appeal. The letter written by the revenue to the standing counsel appearing in this appeal, informing him about non-filing of appeals in other matters is retained in record.
3.The appeal is thus dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue