The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 1, Mumbai v. M/S.uni Deritend Limited
High Court
13 Aug 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 1, Mumbai v. M/S.uni Deritend Limited
Date of order
13 Aug 2010
Assessment year(s)
2004-2005
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 1, Mumbai v. M/S.uni Deritend Limited, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 4.The appeal is accordingly disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.388 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 1, Mumbai
..Appellant.
Versus
M/s.Uni Deritend Limited
..Respondent.
Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellant.None for the respondent.
CORAM : Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud & J.P. Devadhar, JJ.
DATE : 13 August 2010.
P.C. :
1.The appeal arises out of an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for assessment year 2004-2005, dated 16 September 2009. The Tribunal dismissed the Appeal of the Revenue following the judgment of the Special Bench in the case of Topman Exports V/s. Income Tax Officer (Income Tax Appeal No.5769/Mum/2006 decided on 11 August 2009).
This Court has subsequently considered the issue in its decision
AGK
in Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. Kalpataru Colors and Chemicals (Income Tax Appeal (L) No.2887 of 2009). In these circumstances, we have issued a notice on 6 August 2010 to the assessee and directed that the notice shall indicate that the appeal shall be heard finally at the stage of admission. There is an office report to the effect that the assessee has been served. None appears for the assessee.
3.Since the assessee is not present before the Court though served, we are of the view that the ends of justice would be served if the impugned order of the Tribunal is set aside and the proceedings are restored to the file of the Tribunal for a fresh decision in accordance with law. The Tribunal shall, on remand have due regard to the judgment of this Court in Kalpataru Colors and Chemicals (supra).
4.The appeal is accordingly disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
(Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.