In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 1, Mumbai v. Shri Harish P. Dadia (Huf) Mumbai, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The Appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2364 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 1, MumbaiVersus
..Appellant.
Shri Harish P. Dadia (HUF) Mumbai
..Respondent.
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.Mr.K. Gopal for the respondent.
CORAM : Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud & J.P. Devadhar, JJ.
DATE : 13[th] January, 2010.
P.C. :
1.The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the revenue states that the issues which are raised in the appeal are covered against the revenue by the Judgment of this Court in the case of Uttamchand Jain reported in 182 Taxman 243.
2.In the circumstances, we find no substantial question of law in the appeal. The Appeal is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
(Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue