Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 1, Mumb...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 1, Mumbai v. Shri Subhash F. Bafna, Pune

High Court 28 Feb 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 1, Mumbai v. Shri Subhash F. Bafna, Pune
Date of order
28 Feb 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 1, Mumbai v. Shri Subhash F. Bafna, Pune, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 3.In this view of the matter, for the reasons stated therein, the present appeal is also dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.713 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax – 1, Mumbai..Appellant. Versus Shri Subhash F. Bafna, Pune..Respondent. None for the appellant.None for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & Mrs.Mridula Bhatkar, JJ. P.C. : DATE : 28[th] February, 2011. 1.None for the appellant and the respondent. 2.In this case the Tribunal has followed the Special Bench decision in the case of Brahma Associates V/s. CIT reported in 315 ITR 268. The appeal filed by the Revenue in the case of CIT V/s. Brahma Associates (Income Tax Appeal No.1194 of 2010) was dismissed by this Court on 22-02-2011. 3.In this view of the matter, for the reasons stated therein, the present appeal is also dismissed. No costs. (Mrs.Mridula Bhatkar, J.)(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan