The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 1, Mumbai v. Videsh Sanchar Nigam Limited
High Court
20 Jul 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 1, Mumbai v. Videsh Sanchar Nigam Limited
Date of order
20 Jul 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 1, Mumbai v. Videsh Sanchar Nigam Limited, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: 1.Whether the Tribunal was justified in canceling the reopening of the assessment is the question raised in this appeal.
Decision: 3.In this view of the matter, the present appeal is also dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.4235 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax - 1, Mumbai..Appellant.
Versus
Videsh Sanchar Nigam Limited..Respondent.
Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellant.Mr.Dinesh Vyas, Senior Advocate with Mr.Ajit Shah i/by Mr.Srihari Iyer for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & A.A. Sayed, JJ.
P.C. :
DATE : 20[th] July, 2011.
1.Whether the Tribunal was justified in canceling the reopening of the assessment is the question raised in this appeal.
2.The finding of fact recorded by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal is that in the present case the reasons recorded for reopening of the
assessment though repeatedly asked by the assessee were furnished only after completion of the assessment. The Tribunal following the judgment of this Court in the case of CIT V/s. Fomento Resorts & Hotels Limited, Income Tax
Appeal No.71 of 2006 decided on 27th November 2006 has held that though the reopening of the assessment is within three years from the end of
relevant assessment year, since the reasons recorded for reopening of the assessment were not furnished to the assessee till the completion of assessment, the reassessment order cannot be upheld. Moreover, Special Leave Petition filed by the Revenue against the decision of this Court in the case of Fomento Resorts & Hotels Limited has been dismissed by the Apex Court vide order dated 16th July 2007.
3.In this view of the matter, the present appeal is also dismissed with no order as to costs.
(A.A. Sayed, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.