Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 1, Nash...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 1, Nashik v. M/S.gavkari Prakashan 430-H, Nashik

High Court 02 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 1, Nashik v. M/S.gavkari Prakashan 430-H, Nashik
Date of order
02 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 1, Nashik v. M/S.gavkari Prakashan 430-H, Nashik, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.842 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax – 1, Nashik ..Appellant. Versus M/s.Gavkari Prakashan 430-H, Nashik ..Respondent. None for the appellant. CORAM : V.C. DAGA &J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 2[nd] July, 2009 P.C. :1. None for the revenue - appellant. 2.Dismissed for want of prosecution. (J.P. Devadhar, J.) (V.C. Daga, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan