The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, Nashik v. Ramrao Sitaram Patil
High Court
27 Aug 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcaurdb
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, Nashik v. Ramrao Sitaram Patil
Date of order
27 Aug 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, Nashik v. Ramrao Sitaram Patil, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Decision: 3.In the view of above, writ petition is disposed of as abated.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYBENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITON NO. 4733 OF 2012
The Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Nashik..Petitioner
Versus
Ramrao Sitaram Patil ..Respondent
Shri. D. V. Soman, Advocate for Petitioner.Shri. A. D. Pawar, Advocate for Respondent No. 1.
CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA ANDS. M. GAVHANE, JJ. DATED : 27th August, 2018
PER COURT:
th.On 5 February, 2018 when the matter was called out submission
was made by Mr. Alok Sharma, the learned counsel that he is no longer in
a position to appear in the present petition. At his request the matter was
adjourned. Today also none appears for the petitioner.
2.Mr. Pawar, the learned advocate appearing for the respondent
submits that the respondent has also expired long back.
3.In the view of above, writ petition is disposed of as abated. No
costs.
[ S. M. GAVHANE, J. ]
[ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ]
ass/wp 4733.12
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue