Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 1, Nash...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 1, Nashik v. Yadav Builders & Developers

High Court 24 Jun 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 1, Nashik v. Yadav Builders & Developers
Date of order
24 Jun 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax - 1, Nashik v. Yadav Builders & Developers, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: P.C. : 1.Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in deleting the penalty levied under Section 271B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is the question raised in this appeal.

Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2566 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax - 1, Nashik..Appellant. Versus Yadav Builders & Developers..Respondent. Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellant.None for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & Smt.R.P. Sondurbaldota, JJ. DATE : 24[th] June, 2011. P.C. : 1.Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in deleting the penalty levied under Section 271B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is the question raised in this appeal. 2.The findings of fact recorded by the Tribunal in para-5 of its judgment reads thus : "5.In our considered opinion death of a partner can be said to be a reasonable cause for non furnishing of other connected details being in his exclusive possession, before the AO. However, it is not in dispute that the payers wee all agriculturists. It is also not in dispute that all those loans duly been confirmed by the confirmation letter and it is not the case of the Revenue that those depositors were not genuine. Considering the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and case laws cited, we are inclined to hold that no penalty is imposable because of the basic reasons that the impugned failure was due to a reasonable cause hence rightly deleted by CIT (A) as prescribed under Section 273B of the I.T. Act. We direct accordingly, Ground dismissed." 3.We see no error in the decision of the Tribunal. The appeal is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs. (Smt.R.P. Sondurbaldota, J.)(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan