The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 1, Pune v. Bhagini Nivedita Sahakari Bank Limited
High Court
26 Jun 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 1, Pune v. Bhagini Nivedita Sahakari Bank Limited
Date of order
26 Jun 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 1, Pune v. Bhagini Nivedita Sahakari Bank Limited, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeals are thus dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2071 OF 2008ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2074 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 1, PuneVersusBhagini Nivedita Sahakari Bank Limited
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2075 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax – I, PuneVersus
Sampada Sahakari Bank Limited
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellant.None for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA &J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 26[th] JUNE, 2009
P.C. :
1.Heard learned counsel for the revenue. The question of law sought to be raised in these appeals is covered by the Division Bench judgment of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. TheSolapur Nagari Audyogik Sahakari Bank Limited in Income Tax Appeal No.46of 2008 delivered on 16-06-2008.
2.In the light of that, there is no merit in these appeals. The appeals are thus dismissed with no order as to costs.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
(V.C. Daga, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue