The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 1, Pune v. Bharat Forge Limited, Pune
High Court
26 Jun 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 1, Pune v. Bharat Forge Limited, Pune
Date of order
26 Jun 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 1, Pune v. Bharat Forge Limited, Pune, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is thus dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2073 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 1, Pune
..Appellant.
Versus
Bharat Forge Limited, Pune
..Respondent.
Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellant.None for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA &J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 26[th] JUNE, 2009
P.C. :
1.Heard learned counsel for the revenue. The issue sought to be raised in this appeal is squarely covered by the Apex Court judgment in the case of CIT, Delhi V/s. HCL Connect Systems & Services Limited, (2008)174 Taxman 118 (SC).
2.In the light of that, there is no merit in this appeal. The appeal is thus dismissed with no order as to costs.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)(V.C. Daga, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue