The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 1, Pune v. Blue Moon Securities Private Limited
High Court
16 Sep 2011 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 1, Pune v. Blue Moon Securities Private Limited
Date of order
16 Sep 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 1, Pune v. Blue Moon Securities Private Limited, the High Court (2011) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: DATE : 16th September 2011 P.C. : 1.Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in allowing the Miscellaneous Application filed by the assessee under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and recall its earlier order dated 23[rd] July 2010 is the question raised in this appeal.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1002 OF 2011
The Commissioner of Income Tax – 1, Pune
..Appellant.
Versus
Blue Moon Securities Private Limited..Respondent.
Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellant.Mr.Mihir Naniwadekar for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &K.K. Tated, JJ.
DATE : 16th September 2011
P.C. :
1.Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in allowing the Miscellaneous Application filed by the assessee under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and recall its earlier order dated 23[rd] July 2010 is the question raised in this appeal.
2.On perusal of the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, it is seen that the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has allowed the Miscellaneous Application filed by the assessee on the ground that in the original order, the Tribunal failed to consider the decision of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. Gopal Purohit reported in 228
CTR (Bom) 582. It is brought to our notice that on remand fresh order has
already been passed by the Tribunal after hearing the parties.
3.In these circumstances, in our opinion, it is not a fit case to entertain this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
(K.K. Tated, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.