Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 1, Pune...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 1, Pune v. Minilec (India) Private Limited

High Court 29 Jul 2009 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 1, Pune v. Minilec (India) Private Limited
Date of order
29 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax – 1, Pune v. Minilec (India) Private Limited, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The appeals are thus dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.676 OF 2009ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.677 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax – 1, Pune..Appellant.VersusMinilec (India) Private Limited..Respondent. Mr.Vimal Gupta for the appellant.Mr.S.N. Inamdar for the respondent. CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 29TH JULY, 2009 P.C. : 1.Heard learned counsel for the revenue. Since we have held that the foreign travel expenses were rightly allowed by the tribunal and the appeal filed by the revenue has been dismissed on merits and, therefore, the decision of the tribunal in rejecting reopening of assessment cannot be faulted. 2.In the above view of the matter, we do not find any substantial question of law involved in these appeals. The appeals are thus dismissed in limini with no order as to costs. (J.P. Devadhar, J.) (V.C. Daga, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan