The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. Aeonian Investment Co.ltd
High Court
16 Feb 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. Aeonian Investment Co.ltd
Date of order
16 Feb 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. Aeonian Investment Co.ltd, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal shall accordingly stand dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO. O. C. J.
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2974 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax-1.
Vs.
Aeonian Investment Co.Ltd.
.....
Mr.Vimal Gupta for the Appellant.Mr.Atul K. Jasani for the Respondent.
.....
...Appellant.
...Respondent.
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD &J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
16[th] February, 2010.
P.C. :
The office objections are waived. The Registry is
directed to register the appeal.
The question of law in the appeal by the Revenue is as
follows:
“ Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon’ble Tribunal was justified in allowing the claim of deduction u/s.80M notwithstanding the amended provisions of Section 115-O(5) r.w.s. 115-O(1) of the Income Tax Act which was applicable for the assessment year under consideration.”
The Tribunal has relied upon its own decision in the case
of Castle Investment Industries Pvt. Ltd., (ITA 1713/M/2006). The Tribunal has also noted that the judgment of the Tribunal in Castle Investment was confirmed by this Court. The judgment of this Court is dated 22[nd] July 2008 in Income Tax Appeal No.1557 of 2007. In these circumstances, no substantial question of law would arise. The appeal shall accordingly stand dismissed.
( Dr.D.Y.Chandrachud, J.)
( J.P.Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.