Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. M/S....

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. M/S. Blue Star Limited

High Court 07 Mar 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. M/S. Blue Star Limited
Date of order
07 Mar 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. M/S. Blue Star Limited, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the Tribunal was justified in deleting the penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in respect of dis-allowance made on account of curtailment of deduction under Section 80IB of the Income Tax Act.,1961?

Decision: 3)Accordingly, all the appeals are dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2110 OF 2012WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2113 OF 2012 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2128 OF 2012 The Commissioner of Income Tax-1...Appellant. v.M/s. Blue Star Limited. ..Respondent. Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Appellant. Mr. F. B. Andharujinha, Senior Advocate with Mr. B. G. Yewele i/by Rajesh Shah & Co. for the Respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ. DATE : 7th March, 2013 PC: In these appeals for assessment years 2002-03, 2003-04 and 2004-05 following common question has been raised for our consideration. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the Tribunal was justified in deleting the penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in respect of dis-allowance made on account of curtailment of deduction under Section 80IB of the Income Tax Act.,1961? 2)Counsel for the parties state a similar question was raised by the revenue against the respondent assessee in Income Tax Appeal Lodging No.2108/2012. By our order passed today we refused to entertain the appeal of the revenue in Income Tax Appeal Lodging No.2108/2012. For the reasons mentioned in our order passed today in Income Tax Appeal No.2108/2012, we see no reason to entertain the proposed question of law. 3)Accordingly, all the appeals are dismissed with no order as to costs. (M.S.SANKLECHA, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan