The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. M/S. Weizmann Limited
High Court
19 Sep 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. M/S. Weizmann Limited
Date of order
19 Sep 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. M/S. Weizmann Limited, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, Appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
K
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2430 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax-1Vs.M/s. Weizmann Limited
.. Appellant
.. Respondent.
Mr. Abhay Ahuja for the Appellant.Mr. Atul K Jasani for the Respondent.
CORAM: J.P. DEVADHAR & K.K. TATED, JJ.DATE: 19TH SEPTEMBER, 2011.
P.C.
1Whether the ITAT was justified in deleting the interest tax levied on the Assessee on the ground that the Assessee is not liable to be taxed under the Interest Tax Act, 1974, is the question raised in this Appeal.
2The ITAT in para 3 of its order has recorded a finding of fact that the Assessee’s income as well as the assets on account of non-banking financial business is much more than 50% and therefore, the Assessee’s principle business is neither that of financial company nor can it be said to be a credit institution and, therefore, the provisions of Interest Tax Act, 1974 are not applicable to the case of the Assessee in the assessment year in question.
3In our opinion, the decision of the ITAT is based on finding of fact, no question of law arises. Accordingly, Appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(K.K. TATED, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.