The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. M/S.birla International Pvt.ltd
High Court
In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. M/S.birla International Pvt.ltd
Date of order
—
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. M/S.birla International Pvt.ltd, the High Court decided the matter.
Issue: Admit, on the following questions oflaw:- “(a)Whether on the facts and in thecircumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was justified in deleting the disallowance ofRs.1,29,25,000/- being interest on borrowings inrespect of investment in Zenith Ltd. ?
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.341 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax-1...Appellant
vs.
M/s.Birla International Pvt.Ltd....Respondent.
---
Mr.V.G.Gupta, for appellant.
CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED: 8[th] August, 2008.
P.C.:-
1.Heard the learned Counsel appearing for theappellant. Admit, on the following questions oflaw:-
“(a)Whether on the facts and in thecircumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal
was justified in deleting the disallowance ofRs.1,29,25,000/- being interest on borrowings inrespect of investment in Zenith Ltd. ?
(b)Whether on the facts and in the
circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunalwas right in holding that the assessee had madeinvestment in 0% Debenture during normal course ofbusiness with expectation of huge profit when in factthe debentures were issued by the group concerns ofthe respondent assessee ?
To be heard alongwith Income Tax Appealno.36 of 2007.
(D.K.DESHMUKH, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.