Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. M/S....

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. M/S.birla International Pvt.ltd

High Court In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. M/S.birla International Pvt.ltd
Date of order
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. M/S.birla International Pvt.ltd, the High Court decided the matter.

Issue: Admit, on the following questions oflaw:- “(a)Whether on the facts and in thecircumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was justified in deleting the disallowance ofRs.1,29,25,000/- being interest on borrowings inrespect of investment in Zenith Ltd. ?

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.341 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax-1...Appellant vs. M/s.Birla International Pvt.Ltd....Respondent. --- Mr.V.G.Gupta, for appellant. CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH & J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED: 8[th] August, 2008. P.C.:- 1.Heard the learned Counsel appearing for theappellant. Admit, on the following questions oflaw:- “(a)Whether on the facts and in thecircumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was justified in deleting the disallowance ofRs.1,29,25,000/- being interest on borrowings inrespect of investment in Zenith Ltd. ? (b)Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunalwas right in holding that the assessee had madeinvestment in 0% Debenture during normal course ofbusiness with expectation of huge profit when in factthe debentures were issued by the group concerns ofthe respondent assessee ? To be heard alongwith Income Tax Appealno.36 of 2007. (D.K.DESHMUKH, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan