Case LawHigh Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. M/S....

The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. M/S.blue Star Ltd

High Court 19 Mar 2010 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. M/S.blue Star Ltd
Date of order
19 Mar 2010
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. M/S.blue Star Ltd, the High Court (2010) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Issue: The appeal was admitted on the following substantial question of law: “ Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in directing the AO not to exclude 90% of the gross receipts of commission and interest while arriving at the profits of the business eligi...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO. O. C. J. INCOME TAX APPEAL(L) NO.948 OF 2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax-1. Vs. ...Appellant. M/s.Blue Star Ltd. ...Respondent. .... Mr. Vimal Gupta with Mr.Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.Mr.J.B. Andhyarujina,Sr. Advocate with Mr. Balasaheb Yewale i/b. Rajesh Shah & Co. for the Respondent. ..... CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. March 19, 2010. P.C. : The office objections are waived and the Registry is directed to register the appeal. The appeal was admitted on the following substantial question of law: “ Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in directing the AO not to exclude 90% of the gross receipts of commission and interest while arriving at the profits of the business eligible for deduction u/s. 80HHC?” Counsel appearing on behalf of the Revenue and Counsel appearing on behalf of the Assessee agreed that the question would be covered in favour of the Revenue and against the Assessee by the judgment of this Court delivered today in CIT vs. Asian Star Co. Ltd. (Income Tax Appeal No.200 of 2009). The question is accordingly answered in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee for the reasons stated in the judgment. The appeal is allowed. There shall be no order as to costs. ( Dr.D.Y.Chandrachud, J.) ( J.P.Devadhar, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan