Case Law › High Court › The Commissioner Of Income Tax -1 v. M/S...

The Commissioner Of Income Tax -1 v. M/S.kahini Developers Pvt.ltd

High Court 15 Apr 2008 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

15 Apr 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In The Commissioner Of Income Tax -1 v. M/S.kahini Developers Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In view of dismissal of the aforesaid Notices of Motion, the respective Income Tax Appeals also stand dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.723/2007 IN ITXA (L) 22/2007NOTICE OF MOTION NO.724/2007 IN ITXA (L) 23/2007NOTICE OF MOTION NO.725/2007 IN ITXA (L) 24/2007NOTICE OF MOTION NO.726/2007 IN ITXA (L) 25/2007NOTICE OF MOTION NO.727/2007 IN ITXA (L) 26/2007NOTICE OF MOTION NO.728/2007 IN ITXA (L) 27/2007NOTICE OF MOTION NO.729/2007 IN ITXA (L) 28/2007NOTICE OF MOTION NO.730/2007 IN ITXA (L) 29/2007NOTICE OF MOTION NO.731/2007 IN ITXA (L) 30/2007 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.723/2007 IN ITXA (L) 22/2007 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.724/2007 IN ITXA (L) 23/2007 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.725/2007 IN ITXA (L) 24/2007 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.726/2007 IN ITXA (L) 25/2007 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.727/2007 IN ITXA (L) 26/2007 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.728/2007 IN ITXA (L) 27/2007 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.729/2007 IN ITXA (L) 28/2007 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.730/2007 IN ITXA (L) 29/2007 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.731/2007 IN ITXA (L) 30/2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax -1 .. Appellant Vs. M/s.Kahini Developers Pvt.Ltd. .. Respondent Mr.A.S.Rao for the Appellant. Mrs.Usha Dalal for the Respondent. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 15th April, 2008 P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By these Notices of Motion, the Appellant is seeking condonation of 508 days’ delay caused in filing the respective Appeals. Perused the affidavits-in-support of the respective Notices of Motion. It appears that though the last date for filing the respective Appeals was 13.08.2005 and the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax had granted approval for filing the Appeals on 11.08.2005, the Appeals came to be filed belatedly on 04.01.2007. We are not at all satisfied with the reasons given for condonation of delay. The reasons given for delay that of getting the draft memo of Appeal prepared and non-availability of Court fee stamps etc. does not appear to be justifiable. No sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. Hence, all the aforesaid Notices of Motion stand dismissed. 2. In view of dismissal of the aforesaid Notices of Motion, the respective Income Tax Appeals also stand dismissed. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.