The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. M/S.the West Coast Paper Mills Ltd
High Court
02 Apr 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. M/S.the West Coast Paper Mills Ltd
Date of order
02 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. M/S.the West Coast Paper Mills Ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3249 OF 2007
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3249 OF 2007
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3249 OF 2007
IN
IN
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1769 OF 2007
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1769 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax-1 .. Appellant
Vs.
M/s.The West Coast Paper Mills Ltd. .. Respondent
Mr.A.S.Rao with Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant.
None for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 2nd April, 2008
DATE : 2nd April, 2008
DATE : 2nd April, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the
Appellant-revenue. None appears for the
Respondent-assessee. By this Notice of Motion, the
Appellant is seeking condonation of 349 days’ delay
caused in filing the Appeal. For the reasons stated in
the affidavit-in-support of the Notice of Motion,
sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay,
and there is no case of inaction, negligence or want of
bonafide on the part of the Appellant. Even there is no
affidavit in reply filed by the Respondent controverting
the contentions in the affidavit-in-support of the
Notice of Motion. Hence, the Notice of Motion is made
absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
2. Place the Appeal on board for admission on
22.04.2008.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.