The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. M/S.trident Shipping Agencies Pvt.ltd
High Court
07 Feb 2007 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. M/S.trident Shipping Agencies Pvt.ltd
Date of order
07 Feb 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. M/S.trident Shipping Agencies Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4445 OF 2006
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4445 OF 2006
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4445 OF 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2618 OF 2006
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.2618 OF 200
The Commissioner of Income Tax-1 .. Appellant
V/s
M/s.Trident Shipping Agencies Pvt.Ltd. .. Respondent
Mr.A.S.Rao for the Appellant.
Mr.S.E.Dastoor, Senior Advocate with Mr.Nirag Sheth i/by
M/s.Rajesh & Co. for the Respondent.
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN&
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 7th February, 2007.
DATE : 7th February, 2007.
DATE : 7th February, 2007.
P.C.:
P.C.:
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By this
Notice of Motion, the Appellant (Revenue) is seeking
condonation of 463 days delay caused in filing the
Appeal.
2. Perused the affidavit in support of the Notice of
Motion. The affidavit very clearly admits that the last
date for filing the Appeal was 2.9.2005. Mr.Rao, the
learned Counsel for the Appellant on instructions from
his client, states that the Law Ministry ceased to take
care of the matter and it was left with the concerned
Department to take care of the matter in view of the
policy decision. Mr.Rao conceded that from
September-2005 onwards it was the concern of the Income
Tax Department to pursue this matter. The affidavit is
totally silent and there is no reasonable explanation
given with regard to the delay caused in filing the
Appeal from Septmber-2005 til December-2006 which is
more than 15 months. Notice of Motion is totally devoid
of merits and hence stands dismissed.
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.