The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. Namdeo Kashinath Aher
High Court
09 Jun 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. Namdeo Kashinath Aher
Date of order
09 Jun 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. Namdeo Kashinath Aher, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYO. O. C. J.
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2744 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax-1. Vs.
...Appellant.
Namdeo Kashinath Aher.
...Respondent.
....
Mr.N.R.Prajapati for the Appellant.None for the Respondent.
.....
CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
June 9, 2010.
P.C. :
Counsel appearing on behalf of the Revenue states that the issues which are sought to be raised in the appeal are covered against the Revenue by the judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in Commissioner of Income Tax-25 vs. Vijay H.Bhayani, (Income Tax Appeal 691 of 2009 and the companion batch of matters decided by the Division Bench on 29 July 2009). In view of the statement which has been made on behalf of the Revenue, it is not necessary to admit the appeal since no substantial question of law would arise. The appeal is dismissed.
( Dr.D.Y.Chandrachud, J.)
( J.P.Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue